Sports Medicine
A Crucial Period
Good Pain, Bad Pain
On Your Knees
Secondary Injuries
Imaging Technology
What's Sciatica?
The Female Athlete
Putting Your Feet First
Itis Schmitis
Too Much, Too Soon
Under the Influence
Twisted
What's Goin' On?
Think Inches, Not Pounds
Preventing Vaginitis
That Painful Pull
Athlete's Heart
Exercise & Arthritis
Chilled to the Bone
Measuring Body Fat
Exercise and Your Breasts
Choosing a Sports Doctor
Lean on Me (Shoulder)
Exercise & Anemia
Exercise Abuse
Pelvis Sighting
Hand Aid
It's All in the Wrist
Back in Action
Altitude Adjustment
Tennis Elbow, Anyone?
Exercising in the Heat
Agony of the Feet
Restless Legs
Night Time Cramps
Birth Control Concerns
No Periods, No Babies?
Post Partum Prescription
Weight Loss Mystery
Undesirable Cooldown
To Brew Or Not To Brew
Fitness After Baby
Biking and Back Pain
Swimmer's Shoulder
A Hidden Athlete
Avoiding Osteoporosis
Drug Testing
Maximum Heart Rate
Headway Against Headaches
Torn Rotator Cuff
Fat Figures
SOS About PMS
Bloody Urine
Sag Story
Lackluster Leg
Bothersome Bulge
Gaining in Years
Taking It On the Shin
Aching Ankles
Hoop Help
Tender Toes
Meals For Muscle
Growing Pains
Hot Tips
High Altitude PMS
Personal Bests
Air Pollution
Ankle Blues
Heartbreak Heel
Yeast Relief



Measuring Body Fat

Continued...

Pros and cons of various methods

Body fat content is measured indirectly through a variety of techniques, each with a built-in range of error. The sheer number of measurement techniques is an indication that no single method is best.

Underwater weighing is the most accurate method, and the one most often used in research studies on body composition. Because it must be performed in a lab, however, it is relatively costly (about $50 in the Los Angeles area, for example) and not as widely available as other methods.

Based on the principle that fat has greater buoyancy than other tissue, and thus weighs comparatively less under water; testing involves sitting in a chair submerged in water and suspended from a scale. After fully exhaling, you bend forward until you are completely submerged. An observer records your under-water weight while you remain motionless for five to 15 seconds.

Scientists repeat the procedure 10 to 20 times and use an average of the three highest weights to calculate your percentage of body fat. Even in the hands of the best researchers, underwater weighing has an error range of plus or minus 2 to 3.5 percent.

Skin-fold measurement, like underwater weighing, has been used for more than 20 years. The method is based on the hypothesis that the amount of subcutaneous fat is related to total body fat.

Skin and subcutaneous fat are pinched between calipers and the thickness is measured. Measurements are taken three times at each of five sites (waist, thigh, triceps, abdomen and upper back). Equations use the average of these measurements to estimate total bodyfat percentage.

Equations for this method are more accurate for some populations than for others, based on age, sex, body type and fitness level. The accuracy of this technique is also very dependent on the experience and skill of the measurer.

What else causes errors in body fat measurements?

Next | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Previous


Order Now!
Order The Athletic Woman's Survival Guide
Table of Contents

Foreword: Billie Jean King

Comments by Barb Harris
Editor in Chief,
Shape Magazine



General Health
Nutrition
Exercise
Common Medical Problems
Dental Health
Emergency!
Infectious Disease
Sexual Health
Emotional Well-Being
Eating Disorders
Alcohol & Other Drugs
Environmental Health
Prevention


The information in this web site is for educational purposes only and is not providing medical or professional advice. It should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disease. It is not a substitute for professional medical care. If you have or suspect you might have any health problems, you should consult a physician.


Copyright 2000 - Sports Doctor, Inc.